Review: Jurassic World

Starring Chris Pratt, Bryce Dallas Howard, Jake Johnson

Review: Entourage

Starring Adrian Grenier, Kevin Connolly, Jerry Ferrara, Kevin Dillon

Review: San Andreas

Starring Dwayne Johnson, Alexandra Daddario, Carla Gugino

Review: Ex Machina

Starring Alicia Vikander, Oscar Isaac, and Domhnall Gleeson

Review: Pitch Perfect 2

The Pitch is Back!

Showing posts with label Zac Efron. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Zac Efron. Show all posts

Tuesday, April 9, 2013

Review: Liberal Arts
















When people write about liminal moments they wax poetic about the “coming of age.”  And when they crack jokes, it’s usually about the follies associated with the mid-life crisis.  And what of the thirty years that lie between?  That is what the plot of Liberal Arts is about – those three decades when an individual struggles to graduate from who they are to what they think they should be as adults.  When Richard Jenkins’ Peter Hoberg tells Josh Radnor’s Jesse that the world’s dirty little secret is that none of us feel like adults, he reveals the singular thread that ties the plot of Liberal Arts together. 

The narrative follows Jesse (Josh Radnor) – a overly sentimental man-child who spends too much time in the pages of a book and in his own head.  Lost as a thirty something, he carries around an idealized vision of his youth that is reinvigorated by a return trip to his college campus to celebrate the retirement of his favorite professor (Richard Jenkins).  The experience of seeing some old familiar faces, befriending a troubled youth (John Magaro), and striking up a romance with a precocious nineteen years old (Ashley Olsen) forces Jesse to take a hard look at his life – past, present, and future – and assess his struggles to grow into adulthood.
















Radnor, of How I Met Your Mother fame, acts as both writer and director in the film and doesn’t completely fall on his face.  The narrative is a bit chatty and there are clearly some moments of self indulgence, but the arcs do a good job of capturing the pitfalls of nostalgia and contrast them nicely with the sense of impeding finality associated with one’s twilight years.  The young who struggle to be young and the old who struggle to be old with the Radnor stuck in the middle creates a natural tension that helps frame his emotional paralysis. 

It’s not a perfect film though.  Some plot elements are cliché and at times realism is sacrificed for an all-too-cute detail.  Furthermore, the tone oddly sacrifices it subtle touch at crucial junctures of the film, instead opting to hammer home points almost ad nauseum.  Still these issues and an ending that is all too predictable are covered up nicely by good acting.  Richard Jenkins is thoughtful, tragic, and genuine as the retiring professor who is fearful of life beyond his world of academia.  Likewise Elizabeth Olsen as Zibby is precocious, charming, and dynamic – the perfect embodiment of a romance that simply-should-not-be.
















As for the rest of the cast, I found Josh Radnor’s protagonist satisfactory.  It’s hard to separate him from the character of Ted Mosby but in this film he has penned a character that is not much of a stretch for him to play.  It’s not easy to play a likeable character that does some questionable things, but he pulls it off.  On the other hand, I found the work of the usually solid Allison Janney (as cynical Prof. Judith Fairfield) an exercise in hokey over-the-top acting.  Hers was the least palatable of the principle characters and her scenes amongst the worst in the film. 

Clearly this is a movie with the look and feel of the indie production that it is.  It’s dialogue driven and loaded to the gills with sentimentality and nostalgia, and because of this it is not going to appeal to everyone.  However, if films about introspection and those in which the experiences of many come together to paint a complete narrative spark your interest, then this is a movie that you should see.  I don’t think it’s a great movie, but it has some nice qualities.  I don’t think it is supremely entertaining, but I did want to watch it to completion.  Thus, I give Liberal Arts a soft recommendation as a midweek rental that may make you ask yourself a question or two about your life even as you completely forget the film a couple hours after watching it.

Standout Performance: Elizabeth Olsen.  It’s hard not to like the younger sister of Mary Kate and Ashley Olsen as she has shown herself to be a good actress with great screen presence.

Thursday, January 10, 2013

Review: The Paperboy
















There are bad movies and then there are bad movies that feel like they are poisoning your mind.  The Paperboy is a perfect example of the latter.  Grainy film, striking colors, and bad haircuts – this film is a hot mess of every stigma and stereotype associated with the early 1970’s in the southern part of the United States.  Throw into the mix rampant oversexed sensationalism and really bad acting and what you are left with is the kind of camp that makes you want to never watch another Nicole Kidman movie again.  Granted, that’s not much of a sacrifice given her more recent work. 

The movie tells the story of Jack Jensen (Zac Efron) and his brother Ward (Matthew McConaughey) as they work to investigate the plight of Hillary Van Wetter, an inmate on death row accused of killing a corrupt sheriff.  Along the way, they enlist the help of Yardley Acheman – Ward’s colleague at a Miami newspaper, and Charlotte Bless (Nicole Kidman), a woman who has fallen in love with Van Wetter through letters.

The enterprising reporter looking to investigate a wrongful conviction is nothing new.  But what makes this movie different from the others is the depths the creative team is willing to sink to in order to make this film feel edgy.  Racism, sexploitation, closeted homosexuality, and caricatures representing the Deep South, it’s as if writer/direct Lee Daniels wanted to make sure he had all his bases covered.  But really, what he is giving you is a twisted melodrama that would make even Jerry Springer blush.

















Zac Efron is the lead character in this film, but surprisingly, that’s not the biggest indictment against this film.  Don’t get me wrong.  Very little he does is good as he spends most of the movie looking longingly at Nicole Kidman with his usual complete lack of charisma.  Matthew McConaughey, as his brother, more or less sticks to his typical shtick.  Long hair?  Check.  Slow southern drawl?  Check.  Less than stellar performance?  Check.  Yet, McConaughey is also surprisingly not the biggest mark against this film.  That title would have to go to John Cusack, who lately seems hell bent on undoing all the good will he has built up as Mr. Romantic Comedy.  Like his work in The Raven, Cusack  - as a white trash convict - is so far over the top that he derails what little is working in this film.  His is just a cringe-inducing performance from start to finish. 

As for the biggest name on the marquee, Nicole Kidman, her performance is polarizing to say the least.  Some view it as a risky and daring portrayal of an oddly complex character, while others have called it as a campy and vulgar performance turned in by an actress desperately looking to do something provocative to seize headlines.  I am firmly in the latter camp as I found Kidman’s performance unconvincing and questioned many of the choices she made in regards to the role.  Clearly, she is grasping for high-risk high reward roles to make her highly relevant again, but she backed the wrong horse with this film.  Not only is this a terrible movie, but also it is completely inconsequential.

There’s really not much more to say about The Paperboy.  It’s a puzzling movie with very little entertainment value as it takes more than trying to be edgy and playing to stereotypes to put together a compelling story.  Odd choices from start to finish make this a movie you are going to want to avoid at all costs.  Luckily for you, it will not take much effort, because before reading this review, you probably never heard of this movie.  And after finishing this review you probably never will again.

Standout Performance: In an ironic twist, the person with the least amount of acting experience (Macy Gray as Anita Chester) turns in the best performance.  Too bad it was all for naught.  

Friday, August 17, 2012

Review: New Year's Eve

Let’s fast forward through the diatribe I typically express whenever I come across one of those ensemble cast movies that features half of Hollywood (Valentine’s Day, What to Expect When You Are Expecting).  Let’s just accept the fact that I think they are terrible, lack character development, and feature actors just mailing it in.  Having just seen the movie New Year’s Eve I can tell that I saw nothing in this movie that makes me feel otherwise. 

New Year’s Eve follows the lives of a bunch of people in New York City on New Year’s Eve battling the holidays, the elements, and the trite sentimentality that drives their respective matters of the heart.  Why director Garry Marshall – he of Pretty Woman, Beaches, and The Princess Diaries fame – keeps venturing into this genre is beyond me, but rather than completely dismiss the film as a complete write off, I am going to highlight the glorified vignettes and how they don’t work to varying degrees.

Ashton Kutcher and Lea Michele star in the “love in the elevator” portion of the movie and their collective performance plays like two high school drama students acting out a series of romantic clichés.  Not much better than that, is the “mending the fences” storyline as brought to life by Jon Bon Jovi and Katherine Heigl, though there is a thin layer of authenticity to this plot line as Heigl is asked to play a bitter and domineering woman and Bon Jovi a selfish self-centered musician.  On the opposite end of the authenticity spectrum is the performance of Josh Duhamel who plays the role of a cad that has come to grips with his own sentimentality and hopes to find a special someone that he once shared a moment with.  As to who that is, well it is a mystery easily solved about ten minutes into the movie.

Not to be upstaged in the unbelievablity department is the competition between two couples to have the first baby born in the new year for a monetary prize.  Is it unbelievable that this might happen in real life?  No - crazier things have been done in the real world for the almighty dollar.  It is in fact the performances of Seth Myers and Jessica Biel that are hard to fathom.  Myers delivers every other line with his hand-caught-in-the-cookie-jar expression from SNL: Weekend Update, and Biel has yet to master the ability to convince anyone that she can actually act. 

Then there is the arc shared by Michelle Pfeiffer and Zac Efron.  I was sure I would hate this one the most.  I cannot stress how overly contrived, incredibly cliché, and so overused the paradigm for their story line is, however it is still represents the most entertaining parts of the movie.  Effron is believable as a douchebag (obviously) bike messenger, but it is Michelle Pfeiffer who carries their story.  Of the one million characters in the movie, hers is the most sympathetic and the only one that seems to have any real depth despite the limited screen time.

As for the rest of the cast, Hilary Swank is there and fairly dour as she is charged with shouldering the gravitas of the movie.  Likewise Robert DeNiro, Abigail Breslin and Sarah Jessica Parker negotiate the mother-daughter relationship in ways that are not compelling.  Also appearing in the movie are Halle Berry, Common, Cary Elwes, Alyssa Milano (yes, apparently she still acts), Sofia Vergara, Carla Gugino, and so on and so forth and none of them do anything of significance to impact the movie one way or another.  As glorified extras, their presence actually breaks what little reality exist in the film as you find yourself thinking more about actor recognition rather than investing in the characters they are attempting to portray.

So I could sit here and tell you not to watch it (which is what I would suggest) but for the most part it probably won’t make much of a difference.  This is one of those movies that from the moment people first see the trailer, they instantly decide whether or not they are willing to invest their time and/or money on this project.  But if I can save even one person from this disaster, I will say it again: this is not a good movie.  It’s an exercise in quantity over quality so in lieu of one really good plotline you get five terribly weak ones.  The best recommendation I can make is to not only skip this movie, but to quit the genre altogether.

Standout Performance:  Michael Bloomberg and Ryan Seacrest.  They were asked to pay themselves.  It’s about as easy as acting can get.

Saturday, May 19, 2012

May 2012 Editorial: Who's Hot. Who's Not.

As we all know, stars rise almost as quickly as they fall in the revolving door, what-have-you-done-for-me-lately world that is Hollywood.  So here’s quick look at which actors and actresses are trending up (Who’s Hot) and down (Who’s Not) with the help of some friends.






HOT:
Joseph Gordon-Levitt.  Because he is about to appear in The Dark Knight Rises after some  great performances in 500 Days of Summer and Inception.
NOT: Taylor Kitsch.  Because he starred in two movies this summer (John Carter and Battleship) with budgets of $200M that will represent huge busts for Disney and Universal.





HOT:
Robert Downey Jr.  Because he is the lead player in the ensemble cast headlining the record shattering The Avengers (as evidence by his $50M payday) and because I expect him to be just as great in Iron Man 3.
NOT: Reese Witherspoon.  Because she has traded in the innocence and charm that made her famous in Legally Blonde, Just Like Heaven, and Four Christmases for more traditional starlet roles in Water for Elephants and This Means War.  Why go away from what is working?





HOT:
Jeremy Renner.  Because he was great in The Hurt Locker,  Mission Impossible: Ghost Protocol and in The Avengers.  I look forward to seeing him in the Bourne Legacy.
NOT: Nicolas Cage.  Because of Ghost Rider: Spirit of Vengeance, Drive Angry, Season of the Witch, and the list goes on and on.





HOT:
Zac Efron.  Because he has successfully made the transition from child/adolescent roles to adult roles as evidenced by his recent performance in The Lucky One.
NOT:Alec Baldwin.  Because 30 Rock and his annoying Capital One commercials – while once great – have clearly gotten old.





HOT:
Charlize Theron.  Because she is coming off in an interesting turn in Young Adult, and is appearing next in Snow White and the Huntsman, and the much anticipated Prometheus.  And also because she is Charlize Theron.
NOT: Jason Segel.  Because he is coming off  three lukewarm performances in The Muppets, Jeff, Who Lives atHome, and The Five-Year Engagement and because this past season of How I Met Your Mother was the worst yet.




 
Google+