Review: Jurassic World

Starring Chris Pratt, Bryce Dallas Howard, Jake Johnson

Review: Entourage

Starring Adrian Grenier, Kevin Connolly, Jerry Ferrara, Kevin Dillon

Review: San Andreas

Starring Dwayne Johnson, Alexandra Daddario, Carla Gugino

Review: Ex Machina

Starring Alicia Vikander, Oscar Isaac, and Domhnall Gleeson

Review: Pitch Perfect 2

The Pitch is Back!

Showing posts with label Emile Hirsch. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Emile Hirsch. Show all posts

Friday, July 13, 2012

Review: Savages

When I think of Oliver Stone movies, I think of Kevin Costner’s voice saying “back and to the left; back and to the left,” while the same set of frames from the Zapruder film are shown repeatedly.  Sure, Stone has directed over 20 films, but it’s his films associated with some sort of political or social agenda for which he is best remembered.  In regards to his latest movie, Savages, I’ve seen it written that Stone has seemingly made a movie  - free from his typical ideological agendas – designed only to entertain.  Having seen it, I caution you not to believe that hype. 

Savages is a movie about two friends, Ben and Chon (played by Aaron Johnson and Taylor Kitsch respectively) who are independent marijuana producers at risk of being absorbed by the large but fledgling Baja cartel from Mexico.  When they refuse to acquiesce to the demands of the cartel – Elena, the leader of the cartel played by Salma Hayek – uses Blake Lively’s O as the ultimate bargaining chip against the two men.  Violence ensues.

The premise of the film is interesting enough at face value, but things begin to fall apart a bit as the film fleshes out dynamics of the curious love triangle that exists between Kitsch, Lively, and Johnson.  When you add to this mix the chicanery of John Travolta’s corrupt DEA agent Dennis, the grotesque perversion of Benicio Del Toro’s Lado, the out-of-nowhere familial strife of Salma Hayek’s Elena, all against the backdrop of a Meixcan cartel war, it is easy to understand how the key points of the movie get swallowed up by this morass of subcontext to the point where one loses track of what’s at stake.  I liken it to being lost at sea when you can no longer see the shore and thus have lost track of where you were, where you are, and where you are supposed to be heading. 

When the movie pays less attention to this peripheral noise and gets back to the business of people with guns enforcing their agendas, it is at its best.  Oliver Stone does some very good work building tension into the plot and paying that off with sound action sequences.  Unfortunately even that gets diminished at times when Stone breaks the reality of the film by occasionally plugging what amounts to a jambalaya of his poli-social inclinations – everything from going green, to building waterways in Indonesia, to education technology, to legalizing marijuana, and of course government corruption.  While some of these movements are good things, the feeling that Stone is pushing this laundry list of causes breaks the reality of the film.  It is however hard to hold it against him, as the man simply cannot help himself.

The thing that surprises me most about the movie is that Taylor Kitsch delivers a very good performance.  He carries the weight of a war veteran to the role as the iron hammer of the group.  He is a one trick pony as an actor but it just so happens that this one gear suits this role.  Aaron Johnson is also very competent playing the lover to Ktisch’s fighter.  The contrast between the two leads is one of the strongest aspects of the movie.  Blake Lively continues to prove she is not much of an actress and that hers is the voice that narrates the film is in no way a good thing.  Benicio Del Toro is especially strong as the antagonist as his character’s grotesque perversion is palpable and lends credible weight to the proceedings.   As for John Travolta, Emile Hirsch, and Salma Hayek, the best I can say is that each of their performances is adequate but not remarkable.  

I have mixed emotions about the film.  I liked it more than I thought I would, but that doesn’t necessarily mean It was a particularly good movie.  I think at the end of the day Savages is best left for a home entertainment viewing as it is a flawed film and there are plenty of other alternatives in theaters now.  It has issues with tone, pacing, and logic and at times loses its way, but Stone is a well-accomplished director who does just enough with the action sequences to keep the film entertaining. 

Standout Performance: While this is in no way an award-winning performance, Benicio Del Toro turns in what is his most compelling work since Traffic.   

Thursday, April 26, 2012

Review: The Darkest Hour

I have been pretty open about proclaiming Jack and Jill the worst movie of 2011.  I am obviously not alone in this assessment, as about a month ago, that Adam Sandler movie became the first movie to ever sweep the Razzies – setting a new standard for filmmaking.  For those of you who don’t know, the Razzies represent the polar opposite of the excellence that the Oscars try to recognize.  However, I now feel the exact same way I felt when Sean Penn won the Oscar for best male lead for his performance in Mystic River over Bill Murray for his in Lost in Translation.  The voters got it wrong.  Because as bad as Jack and Jill is, there is actually a movie that is worse.

That film is The Darkest Hour.  And having just looked up its domestic theatrical box office numbers ($21MM), I now know why it didn’t get the Razzy recognition that it so deserved.  It’s because no one saw it.  The movie is a low rent amalgamation of 30 Days of Night and Independence Day minus any shred of creativity and execution on the part of the filmmaker, the cast, and crew.  We all get the premise – aliens come to earth to mine the planet of something they value and along the way try to annihilate the human race.  The twist that is supposed to captivate us in this film is that they are invisible, but have an effect on electromagnetism – so an ordinary light bulb becomes the equivalent of an early warning system.  Riveted?  I thought not.

It is really hard to drum up anything good to say about this film.  It stars Emile Hirsch who has done some good work in The Girl Next Door and The Emperor’s Club, but like everything else in this film, he is a complete miss.  Olivia Thirlby stars opposite Hirsch, as a potential paramour against the backdrop of global annihilation and the best I can say about Thirlby is that from certain angles, she vaguely resembles Anne Hathaway.  As for the rest of the cast, they do nothing to distinguish themselves.  Max Minghella and Rachael Taylor are forgettable and the role of Skylar played by Joel Kinnaman could have been played equally as well by any guy from my MBA class.  Seriously.

Bad writing, plus bad direction, plus bad acting all thrown together with low rent special effects is a toxic cinematic mix.  And that is exactly what The Darkest Hour is.  There are things that can be done to mitigate the damage of such deficiencies, but not when they all come together at once.  If you have a choice between watching this movie and contracting food poisoning, take the latter.  Your stomach will recover, but the memory of this cinematic disaster could linger in the mind for a while longer.  In lieu of this film, I would recommend…pretty much anything.

Standout Performance:  Any actor who was offered a role in this film and passed on it.

 
Google+