Review: Jurassic World

Starring Chris Pratt, Bryce Dallas Howard, Jake Johnson

Review: Entourage

Starring Adrian Grenier, Kevin Connolly, Jerry Ferrara, Kevin Dillon

Review: San Andreas

Starring Dwayne Johnson, Alexandra Daddario, Carla Gugino

Review: Ex Machina

Starring Alicia Vikander, Oscar Isaac, and Domhnall Gleeson

Review: Pitch Perfect 2

The Pitch is Back!

Showing posts with label Taylor Kitsch. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Taylor Kitsch. Show all posts

Thursday, August 30, 2012

Review: Battleship

Well, it’s official.  Taylor Kitsch has absolutely no range as an actor.  I thought I would announce that here because it’s probably not a well known fact since according to theatrical box office numbers, most of you have not seen any of his movies.  Having just completed the third leg of the Year of the Kitsch (John CarterSavages, Battleship), I can tell you that he delivered the same performance in each of the movies and that of the three, his work in Battleship was the most onerous. 

When the creative team pitched this film, they probably convinced the fine folks at Universal that they had the winning formula – an amalgamation of ArmageddonFriday Night LightsPearl HarborIndependence Day, and believe it or not – just a tiny bit of Titanic; action director Peter Berg to go along with the long-haired dude from Friday Night Lights; and Rihanna and Brooklyn Decker to provide some eye candy for the young male audience.  And as if all this were not enough to ensure a successful summer popcorn flick, this movie would be based off of Hasbro’s board game, Battleship

Unfortunately, someone forgot to tell the powers-that-be that the core members of this target demographic probably have never played a board game – let alone Battleship, and those old enough to remember the game would probably consider the premise downright silly.  Still with Peter Berg, director of HancockThe KingdomFriday Nights Lights, and The Rundown, attached to the project and an astronomical budget (upwards of $210M), I had some hope that a entertaining film could rise from the rubble.  Sadly, I was wrong.

Forget the silly association to Battleship and the requisite tedious steps taken to tie back to that Hasbro property, because this is a nuts-and-bolts alien invasion movie set out on the ocean.  There’s nothing new about the premise and unfortunately no acting, no action choreography, and no set design is able to compensate for this banality.  It truly feels like a case of "been there; done that."  Many of the scenes in the film remind you of something you’ve seen somewhere only done better, and if any of your hopes for this movie were pinned to the presence of Liam Neeson, then forget about it.  He’s pure window dressing.

As for the cast, Kitsch is his usual low rumbling monotone self, exuding very little presence.  He doesn’t have the shoulders to carry a movie let alone a big budget blockbuster, but given the right role he can be of value to a cast (as in Savages).  Also along for the ride are Brooklyn Decker and Rihanna, two women who are not known for their acting chops and it doesn’t take long to be reminded of that in this film.  Alexander SkarsgardJesse PlemonsPeter MacNicol, et al are adequate at best and do not do enough to warrant much more than a passing mention, and my best guess is that Liam Neeson probably put in a few days of work at most on this set.

But really, this movie isn’t about the cast.  It’s about the spectacle and of course the silly association with Hasbro.  And while it is very mediocre, it certainly is not the worst movie of the year.  I can’t in good faith recommend it, but I am not vehemently against it.  If I were still living up in the northeast and it was a miserable winter night at the end of a long week, I could see the value in mindlessly watching this film.  But really, if you want an alien invasion film, there are so many better choices.  Ditto, if you are looking for a war epic or even a nautical thriller.  There is no shortage of replacements.  What you have then in Battleship is a movie not bad enough to despise but not good enough to remember.  At the end of the day this kind of cinematic mediocrity is relegated to that figurative place where forgotten movies go while Universal execs are left to lament a $200M investment in Taylor Kitsch (though they can take comfort in knowing that they have company in Disney).

Standout Performance: Tadanobu Asano gets a participation award for having to carry the scene that most tediously tries to evoke memories of the board game and for his attempt to sell that scene with such conviction.  

Sunday, August 19, 2012

2012 Vanity Post, Part 2

How does Ted not make this list?  I have no idea, but I digress.  As promised and in the interest of fairness, I have followed up The Vanity Post, Part 1 with a Part 2 that this time around features actors from the past 12 months.  To aid me in this list, I have solicited the help of some fellow cinephiles who are much more inclined than me to take notice of a good-looking man onscreen.  So without further ado, I defer to their expertise.
GENIUS, BILLIONAIRE, PLAYBOY, PHILANTHROPIST

JUSTIN BIEBER MILEY CYRUS LOOKIN MUTHA#$@!

BEING BETTER THAN THE GAP
Ryan Gosling as Jacob Palmer in Crazy Stupid Love

THE BOY WONDER

GOOD OLE NUMBER 20

A LOVER NOT A FIGHTER

MAN OF THE HOUSE
Ryan Reynolds as Matt Weston in Safe House

NO STRINGS ATTACHED
Justin Timberlake as Dylan Harper in Friends with Benefits

FRIDAY NIGHT FIGHT
Taylor Kitsch as Chon in Savages

EYES OF A HAWK
Jeremy Renner as Clint Barton in The Avengers


Friday, July 13, 2012

Review: Savages

When I think of Oliver Stone movies, I think of Kevin Costner’s voice saying “back and to the left; back and to the left,” while the same set of frames from the Zapruder film are shown repeatedly.  Sure, Stone has directed over 20 films, but it’s his films associated with some sort of political or social agenda for which he is best remembered.  In regards to his latest movie, Savages, I’ve seen it written that Stone has seemingly made a movie  - free from his typical ideological agendas – designed only to entertain.  Having seen it, I caution you not to believe that hype. 

Savages is a movie about two friends, Ben and Chon (played by Aaron Johnson and Taylor Kitsch respectively) who are independent marijuana producers at risk of being absorbed by the large but fledgling Baja cartel from Mexico.  When they refuse to acquiesce to the demands of the cartel – Elena, the leader of the cartel played by Salma Hayek – uses Blake Lively’s O as the ultimate bargaining chip against the two men.  Violence ensues.

The premise of the film is interesting enough at face value, but things begin to fall apart a bit as the film fleshes out dynamics of the curious love triangle that exists between Kitsch, Lively, and Johnson.  When you add to this mix the chicanery of John Travolta’s corrupt DEA agent Dennis, the grotesque perversion of Benicio Del Toro’s Lado, the out-of-nowhere familial strife of Salma Hayek’s Elena, all against the backdrop of a Meixcan cartel war, it is easy to understand how the key points of the movie get swallowed up by this morass of subcontext to the point where one loses track of what’s at stake.  I liken it to being lost at sea when you can no longer see the shore and thus have lost track of where you were, where you are, and where you are supposed to be heading. 

When the movie pays less attention to this peripheral noise and gets back to the business of people with guns enforcing their agendas, it is at its best.  Oliver Stone does some very good work building tension into the plot and paying that off with sound action sequences.  Unfortunately even that gets diminished at times when Stone breaks the reality of the film by occasionally plugging what amounts to a jambalaya of his poli-social inclinations – everything from going green, to building waterways in Indonesia, to education technology, to legalizing marijuana, and of course government corruption.  While some of these movements are good things, the feeling that Stone is pushing this laundry list of causes breaks the reality of the film.  It is however hard to hold it against him, as the man simply cannot help himself.

The thing that surprises me most about the movie is that Taylor Kitsch delivers a very good performance.  He carries the weight of a war veteran to the role as the iron hammer of the group.  He is a one trick pony as an actor but it just so happens that this one gear suits this role.  Aaron Johnson is also very competent playing the lover to Ktisch’s fighter.  The contrast between the two leads is one of the strongest aspects of the movie.  Blake Lively continues to prove she is not much of an actress and that hers is the voice that narrates the film is in no way a good thing.  Benicio Del Toro is especially strong as the antagonist as his character’s grotesque perversion is palpable and lends credible weight to the proceedings.   As for John Travolta, Emile Hirsch, and Salma Hayek, the best I can say is that each of their performances is adequate but not remarkable.  

I have mixed emotions about the film.  I liked it more than I thought I would, but that doesn’t necessarily mean It was a particularly good movie.  I think at the end of the day Savages is best left for a home entertainment viewing as it is a flawed film and there are plenty of other alternatives in theaters now.  It has issues with tone, pacing, and logic and at times loses its way, but Stone is a well-accomplished director who does just enough with the action sequences to keep the film entertaining. 

Standout Performance: While this is in no way an award-winning performance, Benicio Del Toro turns in what is his most compelling work since Traffic.   

Wednesday, June 13, 2012

Review: John Carter

It is hard to go into a viewing of John Carter without some sort of predisposition towards the movie, which is noted as not only being a huge financial flop that almost singlehandedly put Disney in the red for the second quarter of 2012 thus putting an end to Rich Ross’ tenure at Disney Studios but also for being one of two theatrical disasters this summer starring Taylor Kitsch formerly of Friday Night Lights.  When you get past all the noise in regards to why the movie tanked – the weak theatrical marketing, the lack of consumer awareness, the head-scratching decision to remove “of Mars” from the original title (“John Carter of Mars”) because of the poor performance of “Mars Needs Moms,” what you realize is that the final product is incredibly mediocre.

The scope is grand and the source material full, but somewhere along the way from novel to script to motion picture the lush grandeur of the full-blown sci-fi epic is lost.  The story focuses on civil war veteran John Carter, who is mysteriously transported to Mars and joins the war that has gripped the barren planet.   From large-scale battles to alien mythology to a romantic love interest, all the elements are present for writer/director Andrew Stanton to orchestrate the kind of compelling narrative that plays to a large target audience. That the final product falls well short of this, I believe, is the product of three key problems.

The first problem is Taylor Kitsch.  The man has two followings – fans of Friday Night Lights and the Twilight crowd, but thus far he has failed to show he has the charisma and acting chops to carry a movie.  A surly demeanor and limited voice inflection can only take you so far on the silver screen and Kitsch has failed to show he has another gear to switch to.  In John Carter, it is his usual formula –  stern glares, deep monotone delivery, and the aforementioned surly demeanor.  It’s hard to care about the protagonist when he is neither interesting, nor likeable, nor charismatic, and that is a huge cinematic setback.

The second problem with the film is that the bar has been set very high for CG heavy sci-fi fantasy films set on other planets by Avatar, which represents a strong mix of creative storytelling, top notch CG, and solid acting.  Unfortunately John Carter pales in comparison across the board.  Mars is hardly a rich visual backdrop for a film and this is exasperated here because the best acting talent in this film (Willem Dafoe, Thomas Haden Church, Bryan Cranston) is buried beneath bland and unimaginative computer generated characters.  As for the live action cast, the movie features C level actors (i.e. Mark Strong, Dominic West, James Purefoy) who are best known for being the fourth lead in every other mediocre action movie.

The third problem with the film is that the source material has served as the inspiration for so many other narratives that the film feels contrived, uninspired, and predictable.  Nothing feels riveting; there are no surprises; and thus the payoff is muted.  One might ask whether the film should be punished for not being groundbreaking?  The simple answer is no, but this film feels oddly like a B-level retread despite the fact that it came with a $250M price tag.

I wouldn’t suggest you go out of your way to see this movie or throw any money at it.  Put it on your Netflix queue or borrow it from a friend; maybe even catch in on cable in a few months.  It’s not going to wow you and you’ll probably at some point after watching it mistake it for some other movie, but it’ll help you pass the time if you’re bored.  If you’re interested in following the theatrical box off train wreck that is Taylor Kitsch, he next appears in the Savages opposite Blake Lively.

Standout Performance: Lynn Collins delivers her lines with conviction.

Saturday, May 19, 2012

May 2012 Editorial: Who's Hot. Who's Not.

As we all know, stars rise almost as quickly as they fall in the revolving door, what-have-you-done-for-me-lately world that is Hollywood.  So here’s quick look at which actors and actresses are trending up (Who’s Hot) and down (Who’s Not) with the help of some friends.






HOT:
Joseph Gordon-Levitt.  Because he is about to appear in The Dark Knight Rises after some  great performances in 500 Days of Summer and Inception.
NOT: Taylor Kitsch.  Because he starred in two movies this summer (John Carter and Battleship) with budgets of $200M that will represent huge busts for Disney and Universal.





HOT:
Robert Downey Jr.  Because he is the lead player in the ensemble cast headlining the record shattering The Avengers (as evidence by his $50M payday) and because I expect him to be just as great in Iron Man 3.
NOT: Reese Witherspoon.  Because she has traded in the innocence and charm that made her famous in Legally Blonde, Just Like Heaven, and Four Christmases for more traditional starlet roles in Water for Elephants and This Means War.  Why go away from what is working?





HOT:
Jeremy Renner.  Because he was great in The Hurt Locker,  Mission Impossible: Ghost Protocol and in The Avengers.  I look forward to seeing him in the Bourne Legacy.
NOT: Nicolas Cage.  Because of Ghost Rider: Spirit of Vengeance, Drive Angry, Season of the Witch, and the list goes on and on.





HOT:
Zac Efron.  Because he has successfully made the transition from child/adolescent roles to adult roles as evidenced by his recent performance in The Lucky One.
NOT:Alec Baldwin.  Because 30 Rock and his annoying Capital One commercials – while once great – have clearly gotten old.





HOT:
Charlize Theron.  Because she is coming off in an interesting turn in Young Adult, and is appearing next in Snow White and the Huntsman, and the much anticipated Prometheus.  And also because she is Charlize Theron.
NOT: Jason Segel.  Because he is coming off  three lukewarm performances in The Muppets, Jeff, Who Lives atHome, and The Five-Year Engagement and because this past season of How I Met Your Mother was the worst yet.




 
Google+