Review: Jurassic World

Starring Chris Pratt, Bryce Dallas Howard, Jake Johnson

Review: Entourage

Starring Adrian Grenier, Kevin Connolly, Jerry Ferrara, Kevin Dillon

Review: San Andreas

Starring Dwayne Johnson, Alexandra Daddario, Carla Gugino

Review: Ex Machina

Starring Alicia Vikander, Oscar Isaac, and Domhnall Gleeson

Review: Pitch Perfect 2

The Pitch is Back!

Showing posts with label Melissa Leo. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Melissa Leo. Show all posts

Friday, September 27, 2013

Review: Prisoners

To say that Prisoners is a set in a cold dour place where hope goes to die would seem an understatement.  From gray skies to weathered buildings to the malaise of mid-life domesticity, the world the film depicts is outwardly bland but inwardly reeks of silent oppression.  The film then poses the question of what happens when tragedy strikes; that silent oppression boils over; and those internalized feelings of desperation become externalized?  So you could say that a Sunday stroll in the park, this movie is not.  But just because Prisoners may not be fun, doesn’t necessarily mean it is terrible.

The film finds the Dover family spending Thanksgiving with the Birch family at their home.  During the course of the festivities, the youngest of each family – Anna Dover and Joy Birch – go missing.  Initially they are presumed to have gone for a walk in the neighborhood, but when a search proves futile, Detective Loki (Jake Gyllenhaal) is called in to investigate the case.  With many leads in play, Gyllenhaal’s Loki launches a search that takes the investigation deep into the town’s past and uncovers some dark secrets.

You could look at this synopsis and assume it’s your typical small town narrative featuring a cop who works the suspects through a number of plot twists until the criminal mastermind is revealed in the third act.  On some level, this would be true, but that would not do director Denis Villeneuve and writer Aaron Guzikowski’s film justice.  There are religious undertones that delve into the nature of relationships between father and child as well as wife and husband.  Sure, the film features physically gruesome acts and moments of thrilling tension to keep the audience on the edge of their respective seats, but this film is ultimately an intense character sketch.

A lot of what works about this film begins and ends with Hugh Jackman as Keller Dover.  One of the most recognizable stars in the world, he disappears into this role in impressive fashion channeling the requisite raw emotion and intensity.  He has the unique challenge of making the audience empathize with his character even during those moments where his actions might make it difficult to do so, but his commitment to the role allows him to pull it off.  His work in this film won’t garner the praise and recognition of some of his higher profile roles, but it is every bit as good. 

Working opposite Jackman is Jake Gyllenhaal as Detective Loki.  I have to be honest and say that it was not his best work.  It was not even his best portrayal of a police officer.  That distinction would have to go to his work in End of Watch.  In this film, he is wildly uneven and inconsistent, making it difficult to wrap your head around the character.  Some of these issues have to be script related as the Detective Loki at times acts and reacts in a way contrary to what we’ve been told about the character, but then Gyllenhaal does nothing to help.  By failing to embrace the role with vigor and to make the character his own, he fails to smooth out some of those wrinkles.

Then there is Terrence Howard as Franklin Birch.  Depending on whom you believe, Howard was bounced from Iron Man 2 for either his inability to act or to the size of his contract for the sequel.  After seeing him in this film, I am convinced that it was the latter.  His performance is an epic fail from start to finish punctuated by a couple of instances where his acting during grave moments actually elicited laughter from the viewing audience.  And believe me when I tell you that this is exactly the wrong kind of movie for an actor to be unintentionally funny.

Two members of the cast who faired better are Viola Davis and Paul Dano.  Davis (as Nancy Birch) is strong yet vulnerable as a grief stricken mother and she channels all the emotions as an actor that Terrence Howard cannot.  Dano also turns in good work as Alex Jones, a young man suspected of kidnapping the two girls.  It’s not easy to be simplistic, detached, undeveloped yet menacing all at the same time, but he does so despite the paucity of spoken lines.

As for the rest of the cast, Melissa Leo is satisfactory playing Holly Jones (kin to Alex Jones) but gets props for the physical transformation she undergoes to play a much older woman.  Maria Bello is also satisfactory as she plays the grieving mother by the book, just hitting the right notes at the right time – nothing more and nothing less.  And the younger members of the cast, they collectively do just enough not to stand out but then not much else is truly asked of them.

When you pull all these pieces together, it is clear that Prisoners is at the least a decent film from a technical aspect; tension and drama from a character-driven script, strong acting from the lead, and a few gems from the supporting cast to add depth and greater weight to the stakes embedded in the narrative.  Still, I don’t think this is a movie for everyone.  I am always the first to say that at the very least, a movie should be fun and entertaining and this one is definitely not the former.  Instead it’s trying to pull you into this place where it is cold, dark, and conflicted.  So if this sounds like your cup of tea, I would encourage you to give this one a look on DVD after its theatrical run.  For everyone else, catch it on cable somewhere down the line or take pass altogether.  It probably won’t make any of your top ten lists, but it won’t compel you to swear off movies forever.

Standout Performance:  Hugh Jackman.  A gifted triple threat performer who truly embraces all that this role requires.

Sunday, April 21, 2013

Review: Oblivion
















If you have seen Tron: Legacy, then you know that director Joseph Kosinski has a very good eye for visual flair.  For all of Legacy’s narrative shortcomings, it was indeed a visually stunning film worthy of an IMAX and/or 3D viewing.  In his latest film, Oblivion, Kosinski brings that same panache and combines it with stark post apocalyptic imagery reminiscent of films like The Day After Tomorrow to paint an intriguing backdrop against which the plot of the film unfolds.  Unfortunately that narrative, billed by some as a mind bending sci-fi plot in the vein of Inception and Looper, is slower, less complex, and less intelligent than the aforementioned films.  The result is a product short on substance wrapped in sleek packaging.

The plot of the movie finds us in a post apocalyptic Earth ravaged by war with alien Scavs.  Forced to abandon the planet, the human race has large machines mining the planet for water in order to facilitate their relocation to Titan – a moon of Jupiter.  The film focuses on Tom Cruise’s Jack, a tech officer who has been left behind with Andrea Riseborough’s Victoria to maintain drones, charged with protecting the machines from the remaining Scavs.  When an unknown spaceship crashes to earth, it leads to a series of events that forces Cruise’s Jack to take a hard look at everything he believes to be true.
















If the movie simply aspired to be a post apocalyptic sci-fi romp with humans and aliens squaring off, there are enough plot elements and stunning visuals to successfully accommodated this.  Unfortunately, after a number of writers and re-writes, the desired direction was something a bit more intellectual – not your average run of the mill action movie, but rather a clever tale with one or two big reveals designed to send your mind into a tizzy.  Unfortunately, the clever part may have been lost in one of the re-writes or perhaps on the editing room floor.

The best parts of the film are when there is motion, movement, and action.  There is a rich visual landscape to support this type of narrative.  The worst parts of the film are when they are setting up the more “intellectual” aspects of the plot.  Too much time is dedicated to the painstakingly slow exposition that is not as nearly clever or engaging as Kosinksi and crew believe.  Despite this, what ultimately dooms the film is its inability to engage on an emotional level.  The way it is framed and unfolded, I couldn’t help but feel like I didn’t have a dog in this fight, which is odd since it was a fight for the survival of the human race.  It just never felt like the stakes were that high.
















As for the work of the cast, it felt like it was Tom Cruise and then everyone else. Cruise will never be recognized as a great character actor and really only has two different gears, but he’s a workhorse who is dedicated to his craft.  He isn’t great in this movie as he spends stretches of this movie in cruise control (pun intended), but the work he does in scenes evoking isolationism and nostalgia are some of the best in the movie.  It’s not nearly his best work, but I walked out of the theater feeling he did about as much as he could considering the script.

The same cannot be said for Morgan Freeman and Olga Kurylenko.  Kurylenko has an excuse.  She is a not-particularly-gifted actor, who is hard to connect with, as she seems nearly incapable of genuinely emoting on screen.  I don’t think it is a stretch to assume that the reason she gets cast in movies is that she is very easy on the eyes.  Morgan Freeman on the other hand has no excuse for his poor showing.  He is a very good actor (Shawshank Redemption, The Dark Knight) with strong screen presence, who completely mails in his performance.  It’s a lazy disappointing turn that cripples the plot at a crucial juncture of the film.  To say that Freeman’s star faded significantly for me after watching this film is an understatement.
















As for the rest of the cast, Andrea Riseborough as Cruise’s tech partner Victoria is satisfactory.  She does a descent job of portraying a detached and oblivious pawn, while Melissa Leo shows herself a bit better as Sally – the face of mission control.  She is cold and robotic with just the right amount of creepy to hint that something is amiss.  However, neither of these performances is impactful enough to elevate what is completely pedestrian work from start to finish.

If the preceding seven paragraphs have said anything, it’s that Oblivion is a mixed bag that is not nearly as clever as the creative team believes it to be.  I liken this project to Icarus, the mythological figure who dared to fly too close to the sun.  In aspiring for too much, Kosinski and crew crash and burn what could have been an entertaining (albeit vacuous) action flick.  I don’t think you should go out of your way to see this film in the theater or add it to your movie library at home, but a convenient cost-effective viewing at some point on your own terms probably won’t leave you feeling completely burned.  My guess here is that Oblivion is just the first in a series of movies that over the next few months will garner this same reaction.

Standout Performance: Melissa Leo.  Her character hits just the right pitch to hint that things are amiss.

 
Google+